CremePie Swap Review: Is the Polygon DEX Legit or a Scam?
CremePie Swap Legitimacy Checker
24-hour trading volume
$0
Established DEXs show millions in daily volume
Assets locked in liquidity pools
$0
Major DEXs have billions locked
Contract verification status
Not Audited
Reputable projects have audit reports
Discord, Telegram, Reddit presence
None Found
Active projects have strong communities
CremePie Swap is flagged as high-risk with multiple red flags:
- Zero trading volume and TVL
- No smart contract audits
- Missing community engagement
- Unverified token listings
- Low trust scores from third-party detectors
For safer DeFi participation, consider established DEXs like QuickSwap, SushiSwap, or Uniswap.
| Exchange | Daily Volume (USD) | Total Value Locked (USD) | Audits | Community |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CremePie Swap | $0 | $0 | None | None |
| QuickSwap | ~$12M | ~$200M | Yes | Active |
| SushiSwap | ~$30M | ~$1B | Yes | Active |
Recommendation
Avoid investing in CremePie Swap due to its lack of liquidity, unverified contracts, and inactive community. Choose proven platforms like QuickSwap or SushiSwap for safer DeFi experiences.
When a new DeFi platform pops up, the first question is always the same: CremePie Swap review - does it actually work or is it just another rug pull? This article walks you through the facts, the numbers, and the red flags so you can decide whether to trust the exchange, its CPIE token, and the whole ecosystem built on Polygon.
What is CremePie Swap?
CremePie Swap (often shortened to CremePieSwap) is a decentralized exchange (DEX) that runs as an automated market maker (AMM) on the Polygon blockchain. The platform’s native token, CPIE, has a fixed supply of 5billion tokens, all of which are reported as circulating.
Core Features Offered
- Simple token swaps using Polygon’s low‑fee network.
- Liquidity pools where users can deposit CPIE or other tokens to earn a share of transaction fees.
- Staking contracts that lock CPIE for periodic rewards.
- Yield‑farming combos that pair CPIE with other assets for higher APRs.
- Community governance that lets token holders vote on fee structures and future upgrades.
- An integrated lottery and a price‑prediction market that claim to add entertainment value.
On paper, the feature list mirrors what you’d find on reputable DEXs like QuickSwap or SushiSwap. The real test, however, is whether any of these services are actually functional.
Market Performance and On‑Chain Data
As of the latest snapshot (October2025), the CPIE token shows a quoted price of $0 and a 24‑hour trading volume of $0 across all markets. CoinMarketCap lists CremePie Swap as an “Untracked Listing,” meaning the platform does not meet the verification criteria for a full listing. The exchange’s public pair page simply reads “No data is available now,” indicating either zero activity or hidden activity.
When you compare that to established Polygon DEXs, the gap is stark. QuickSwap regularly processes over $10million daily, while SushiSwap’s Polygon deployment moves several million dollars each day. Those platforms also appear on DeFiLlama’s TVL rankings with billions locked, whereas CremePie Swap is absent from every major TVL tracker.
Legitimacy Checks and Community Sentiment
Multiple independent services have flagged the site (cremepieswap.in) as high‑risk. Scam‑detector.com gave it one of the lowest trust scores, citing 53 red‑flag factors such as lack of team transparency, missing audit reports, and a non‑functional trading interface. TrustScores.org notes that no verified user reviews are publicly visible, and a quick search of Reddit, Telegram, and Discord yields virtually no discussion threads about the project.
In short, the community footprint is almost non‑existent. Legitimate DeFi projects typically have active Discord servers, GitHub repositories with recent commits, and regular roadmap updates - none of which can be located for CremePie Swap.
Side‑by‑Side Comparison with Established DEXs
| Exchange | Daily Volume (USD) | Total Value Locked (USD) | Token Supply | Launch Year | Primary Chain |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CremePie Swap | $0 | $0 | 5B CPIE | 2023 | Polygon |
| QuickSwap | ~$12M | ~$200M | Native MATIC | 2020 | Polygon |
| Uniswap (v3) | ~$100M | ~$5B | UNI, 1B | 2018 | Ethereum |
| SushiSwap | ~$30M | ~$1B | SUSHI, 250M | 2020 (Polygon) | Polygon/Ethereum |
Even on a purely numeric level, CremePie Swap fails to meet the basic thresholds that define a functioning DEX. Zero volume and zero TVL mean users cannot realistically trade or earn any fees.
Red Flags and Risks for Potential Users
- Lack of liquidity. With no reported pools, any attempted swap would likely revert or suffer massive slippage.
- Unverified smart contracts. The contract address (0xfad7…a6a1B8) has not been audited by any reputable firm, increasing the chance of hidden backdoors.
- Zero community support. No active Discord, Telegram, or Reddit threads means you have no place to ask questions or report bugs.
- No documentation. The website offers few tutorials, no API docs, and no roadmap, making onboarding extremely difficult.
- Negative third‑party ratings. Low trust scores from scam‑detector.com and the “Untracked Listing” status on CoinMarketCap are strong warning signs.
Combined, these factors suggest that any capital placed in CPIE or on the platform could be lost without recourse.
How to Safely Choose a DEX
- Check on‑chain metrics: Look for real‑time volume and liquidity on explorers like Polygonscan.
- Verify audit reports: Reputable projects will link to audits from companies like Certik or Hacken.
- Gauge community activity: Active Discord, Telegram, and subreddit threads are good signals.
- Confirm listings on major aggregators: CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko, and DefiLlama should have full data.
- Start small: If you must try a new platform, begin with a few dollars and monitor the transaction outcomes.
Applying these steps will help you avoid platforms that look shiny on the surface but have no substance underneath.
Final Takeaway
Based on the data available, CremePie Swap appears to be a high‑risk, possibly non‑functional DEX with zero trading activity, no verifiable liquidity, and a series of red flags from independent watchdogs. For anyone looking to trade on Polygon, established options like QuickSwap, Uniswap, or SushiSwap offer transparent metrics, audited contracts, and active communities. Until CremePie Swap can prove real volume, publish audited code, and engage users, the safest bet is to stay away.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CremePie Swap a real DEX or a scam?
All available evidence points to a non‑functional platform with zero volume, no audits, and low trust scores, indicating a very high risk of fraud.
Can I buy CPIE token on any major exchange?
No. CPIE is not listed on CoinGecko, Binance, or other reputable exchanges. It only appears on the untracked CreamPieSwap page.
What are the main differences between CremePie Swap and QuickSwap?
QuickSwap shows multi‑million daily volume, audited contracts, and active community support. CremePie Swap shows zero volume, no audits, and almost no community presence.
How can I verify if a DEX’s smart contract is safe?
Look for audit reports from reputable firms, check the contract code on GitHub, and review on‑chain activity using explorers. Reputable DEXs always link to these resources.
Should I stake CPIE for rewards?
Given the lack of liquidity and the unclear status of the platform, staking CPIE would expose you to high risk with little to no guarantee of reward payouts.
Looking at the numbers, it’s clear that CremePie Swap isn’t moving any real volume. Zero TVL means there’s nothing for users to trade against, which basically makes the AMM a hollow shell. Even the basic token CPIE shows a price of $0, so there’s no incentive to provide liquidity. Without community chatter or an audit, I’d stay away until something changes.
All the red flags line up like a conspiracy-no audit, no community, and a dead website. It’s the classic “shiny token, no substance” trap that scammers love to deploy. If you’re looking for a safe spot, stick with QuickSwap or SushiSwap instead.
Sounds like a ghost DEX to me 😕
From a cultural perspective, DeFi projects usually build a community first, then the tech follows. CremePie Swap skips that step entirely, leaving no Discord or Telegram to speak of. The lack of a GitHub repo also suggests there’s no open‑source development happening. Without visible code, it’s impossible to assess security. In short, the project feels isolated and unfinished.
Imagine a marketplace where the stalls are empty, the lights are off, and the merchants never show up-that’s CremePie Swap. The promises of staking and lottery feel like a mirage in a desert of zero liquidity. Every feature they list is a phantom, haunting users with hope that never materializes. It’s a dramatic reminder that hype alone can’t sustain a DEX. Best to walk away before the illusion collapses.
Upon rigorous examination, the data presented herein raises substantial concerns; the absence of trading volume, coupled with a total value locked of zero, constitutes a profound deficiency in fundamental metrics; moreover, the lack of any third‑party audit further exacerbates the risk profile, rendering the platform exceedingly perilous for prospective investors; consequently, prudent actors are advised to redirect capital toward established alternatives possessing verifiable liquidity and audited contracts.
Zero volume and zero TVL are immediate deal‑breakers. Stick with audited DEXs.
I get why people are curious about new projects, but the facts here are stark. No liquidity means no real trades, and no community leaves you in the dark. It’s better to learn from this and focus on platforms with transparent data. Keep your capital safe.
In accordance with standard due‑diligence procedures, the lack of observable activity on CremePie Swap disqualifies it as a viable trading venue. Absence of audit documentation further undermines confidence. Users are recommended to engage with exchanges that provide transparent metrics.
Wow-another total scam! Zero volume?? Zero TVL?? No audit?? This is a textbook rug‑pull setup!!! Stay far away!!!
Honestly, i think its definetly a trap. The site looks real at first but then you see the total liquidity is zilch. No commmunity, no audit, just a bunch of glitzy promises. If u put any coin in, u might never see it again. Its like a black hole for your money, no joke.
I understand the appeal of trying something new, but the evidence points to a high‑risk scenario. Without liquidity or community support, your funds could be stuck. It’s wiser to wait for clearer signals.
Curious how a DEX can announce so many features yet show no on‑chain activity. Is there a hidden backend we’re missing, or is this simply a placeholder site? Either way, the lack of audit and community makes me hesitant. I’d love to see a roadmap before considering any involvement.
Yo, this looks like a total rug. No point in even looking.
Hey folks, just a friendly heads‑up: diving into a platform with zero TVL is like stepping into a pool with no water. The promises sound sweet, but the reality is a dry well. Keep your assets where the community talks and the numbers back it up. Stay safe and happy trading!
When you read the CremePie Swap review, the first thing that jumps out is the sheer emptiness of its on‑chain footprint, a fact that should set off alarm bells for anyone even mildly familiar with the mechanics of decentralized finance; the fact that both daily trading volume and total value locked sit stubbornly at zero is not just a red flag, it is a glaring neon sign that says “do not proceed.” Moreover, the absence of any third‑party audit means there is no independent verification of the smart contract code, leaving the door wide open for hidden backdoors, malicious functions, or outright rug‑pull mechanisms that could be triggered at the discretion of the developers. Coupled with the total lack of community presence-no Discord, no Telegram, no subreddit activity-there is no avenue for users to raise concerns, receive updates, or verify the legitimacy of the project’s claims. In the DeFi world, community and transparency are not optional extras; they are the lifeblood that sustains trust and ensures that code can be scrutinized by a wide audience. The token CPIE, despite being listed on the platform’s own site, shows a price of $0, indicating that no market makers or liquidity providers have taken the risk to price it, further confirming the platform’s inert state. Even the promotional features-staking, yield‑farming, lotteries-are nothing more than hollow promises when there are no funds to distribute as rewards. If a project truly wanted to attract users, it would showcase real transaction data, publish audit reports from firms like Certik or Hacken, and foster an active community where developers and token holders can interact. Instead, CremePie Swap presents a pristine but empty facade, a classic example of what many refer to as a “paper project” that looks good on paper but collapses under the weight of reality. The combination of zero liquidity, non‑audited contracts, and non‑existent community creates a perfect storm for potential investors to lose their capital without any recourse. As a result, the rational approach is to steer clear, keep your assets on established DEXs, and treat any outreach from CremePie Swap with extreme skepticism. In short, unless the team can produce verifiable proof of activity and security, the platform remains a high‑risk, likely fraudulent endeavor. Investors should also consider the opportunity cost of tying up funds in an unproven ecosystem, as even a small allocation can represent a significant loss when the project never launches. Additionally, the lack of documentation-no API guides, no roadmap-means there is no roadmap to follow, leaving users in the dark about future developments. The broader market has already seen several similar cases where projects vanished after raising funds, further underscoring the pattern. Therefore, maintaining vigilance and conducting thorough due diligence remains the best defense against such schemes. Ultimately, the safest bet is to allocate capital to platforms with transparent metrics, audited contracts, and active community governance.
Agreed, the lack of data and community is a deal‑breaker; investors should steer clear.
Wow, you’ve just painted the whole picture-talk about a total nightmare! 😱